admin

A Ductile Iron Pipe Manufacturer was using our conventional product, 500*5*38 COW wheel with Al- Oxide and buying approximately 1500 to 1600 wheels to cut Ø 800 and 600 Di pipe for only One Line and the investment cost was Rs 23.52 Lac per month (282.24 Lac per year). Topline proposed a trial of [...]

A tool manufacturer in Netherlands, ordered Topline abrasives from India, used in a 5-Axis Tool Grinding Machine and compared it against a competitors product. The component was Carbide End Mills for resharpening. The abrasive features under both brands were similar. The customer found the surface finish and wheel life for the competitors abrasives to be [...]

A customer who is a manufacturer of air compressors and pneumatic tools, was using a competitor abrasive for a WMW machine. This abrasive was a gear with a wheel life of 16 gears, with a surface finishing of 0.6 uRa Max. The material removal was 0.4 to 0.5 mm, and taken single cut 10 to [...]

An automobile manufacturer was using a competitor’s abrasive for crank pin grinding. The dressing frequency was every two pins and the surface finish was RZ-3.3 Max. The wheel life is 5944 pieces. We recommended the same product under Topline. The product had the same features to the competitors, except that the Topline wheel life is [...]

An Engine Valve Customer was using a competitor’s Centreless Grinding Wheels 500*100*304.8, with a wheel life of 30,000 minutes approximately. Material Removal with their wheel was 0.2 and 0.4, and the dressing frequency- after 80 jobs. We recommended Topline Centreless grinding wheel with better dressing frequency- after 90/100 jobs and a better wheel life of [...]

A manufacturer of castings products and foundry equipment was using a competitor’s abrasive products for a Swimfram Grinder-05. This abrasive was a crack cage with a diameter of 393, and weight of 18.69 kg. The material removed was 0.13 kg in 2.16 minutes. The average cycle time was 2 minutes, 16 seconds. We recommended our [...]